Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Wordfast Anywhere
Poster: neilmac
Post title: Same here
[quote]DZiW wrote:
... I still prefer 'offline' WFC ('C' stands for 'Classic') not only because it's really lightweight and flexible, but also because of a usual MS Word native environment and its settings, which help me a lot.
Frankly, I don't mind working via WFA, however I use it from time to time for
1) one should consider NDA (even taking into account the vendor's disclaimer and https - a secure protocol option);
2) rather rigid interface and features/limited settings (comparing to WFC/Pro);
3) a fast and stable Internet connection required, of course (which is not always possible for me, at least not 'anywhere');
4) not so fluent work-flow (to my mind);
5) occasional 'site maintenance' and other nuances.
...
Cheers. [/quote]
These are the same main reasons that I stick with WF Classic - its simplicity, reliability, confidentiality, an interface I am used to and like, and non-dependence on an internet connection.
Topic: Wordfast Anywhere
Poster: neilmac
Post title: Same here
[quote]DZiW wrote:
... I still prefer 'offline' WFC ('C' stands for 'Classic') not only because it's really lightweight and flexible, but also because of a usual MS Word native environment and its settings, which help me a lot.
Frankly, I don't mind working via WFA, however I use it from time to time for
1) one should consider NDA (even taking into account the vendor's disclaimer and https - a secure protocol option);
2) rather rigid interface and features/limited settings (comparing to WFC/Pro);
3) a fast and stable Internet connection required, of course (which is not always possible for me, at least not 'anywhere');
4) not so fluent work-flow (to my mind);
5) occasional 'site maintenance' and other nuances.
...
Cheers. [/quote]
These are the same main reasons that I stick with WF Classic - its simplicity, reliability, confidentiality, an interface I am used to and like, and non-dependence on an internet connection.