Quantcast
Channel: ProZ.com Translation Forums
Viewing all 6221 articles
Browse latest View live

WFP 5.8 - can I configure the information displayed in the terminology panel? | It's an interesting tool, but ...

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: WFP 5.8 - can I configure the information displayed in the terminology panel?
Poster: Michael Beijer
Post title: It's an interesting tool, but ...

It's an interesting tool, but the crazy way it handles simple things like confirming segments (with all those colours and statuses being reset after a restart) made me switch back to memoQ/CafeTran.

Michael

WFP 5.8 - can I configure the information displayed in the terminology panel? | Too many WF versions to maintain and develop?

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: WFP 5.8 - can I configure the information displayed in the terminology panel?
Poster: Comunican
Post title: Too many WF versions to maintain and develop?

I think part of the problem with Wordfast in general is that they are spreading themselves too thinly by having a Word version, a browser version and the desktop version.
I suspect they have too much to maintain and develop and the problem is that none of the versions are especially good compared to the competition. I'm currently holding my breath (and getting pretty blue in the face by now!) for the upcoming new release of Wf Pro. Although there is much I like about Wf Pro (and use it for all my translation work - mainly because I like one single environment), it and the online and Word formats do have quite a few weaknesses (some of which I have fed back to them over the months), and which I feel sure could be fixed fairly easily.... I just hope they are working very hard right now to get it up to scratch and impress us....

[Edited at 2019-07-08 13:55 GMT]

[Edited at 2019-07-08 15:50 GMT]

WFP 5.8 - can I configure the information displayed in the terminology panel? | Different people are involved

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: WFP 5.8 - can I configure the information displayed in the terminology panel?
Poster: Jean Lachaud
Post title: Different people are involved

AFAIK, the non-Pro versions (Wf Classic, Wf Anywhere, as well as Wf Server and Wf Aligner) have been developed by Yves Champollion, who is not involved with the development of WfPro, making the latter akin to a separate entity.

As a matter of fact, the lack of similarities of the features, to say nothing of user-friendliness, between between Classic and Pro, which has been painfully obvious forever, should be enough to prove my educated assumption correct.

[quote]Comunican wrote:

I think part of the problem with Wordfast in general is that they are spreading themselves too thinly by having a Word version, a browser version and the desktop version.

Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5
Poster: Hedwig Spitzer Cáceres

Hi,

I have been using my reliable, friendly, preferred and only WFP3 CAT tool for more than 15 years now (yes!!). I have been reluctant to update to WFP5 because of the usual: always an important project coming in, TMs and glossaries are perfect the way they are, being afraid of losing productivity and changing from something simple to something… unknown. Moreover, WFP5 scares me because of all the reported annoying bugs many people complain about in different forums.
However, last Windows 10 major update has produced some bugs in WFP3. Since it is considered legacy software, we can no longer expect any updates so it is time for me to finally upgrade.

Any tips on how to do it smoothly? Or what not to do to get things right according to your experience?

Thanks!

Forcing exported or saved files to be txml

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Forcing exported or saved files to be txml
Poster: Reed James

For some time now, I have wanted to save Wordfast files as TXML instead of TXLF as is the format in version 5. It seems this is impossible, at least I have not been able to find any information to the contrary. Many a project manager has requested TXML, and I have had to use the workaround of delivering a glp package.

Now I would really like to use Verifika, but it has Wordfast files down as TXML and will not accept TXLF. So, Is there a way I can make it work and use Verifika. This would really be nice.For some time now, I have wanted to save Wordfast files as TXML instead of TXLF as is the format in version 5. It seems this is impossible, at least I have not been able to find any information to the contrary. Many a project manager has requested TXML, and I have had to use the workaround of delivering a glp package.

Now I would really like to use Verifika, but it has Wordfast files down as TXML and will not accept TXLF. So, Is there a way I can make it work and use Verifika. This would really be nice.

Forcing exported or saved files to be txml | .txlf seems to be another flavor of the xliff format...

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Forcing exported or saved files to be txml
Poster: Jorge Payan
Post title: .txlf seems to be another flavor of the xliff format...

...and if so, those files should be opened by other CAT tools. If fact, I know that MemoQ pertinent xml filter process them in a very straightforward manner.

Have you tried to open the .txlf files as xml in WF Pro 3 and then renaming their extension to .txml?

Saludos

Forcing exported or saved files to be txml | I don't own Wordfast 3…

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Forcing exported or saved files to be txml
Poster: Reed James
Post title: I don't own Wordfast 3…

Changing the file extension in version 5 doesn't work. I don't own version 3, so that's not an option. I'm not really sure why they started the txlf extension when txml is still needed

Forcing exported or saved files to be txml | AFAIK

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Forcing exported or saved files to be txml
Poster: Samuel Murray
Post title: AFAIK

[quote]Reed James wrote:
Now I would really like to use Verifika, but it has Wordfast files down as TXML and will not accept TXLF. [/quote]

Option 1: AFAIK, if you open TXLF files in WFP3, they get saved as TXML. Then you can process the TXML files. Then, after wards, "save as" back to TXLF again.

I'm not sure if WFP3 accepts TXLF out of the box, but you can add a filter for (use XLIFF as the base) via Edit > Preferences > Translations > Filters > Formats. I can't remember how exactly I did it, but my WFP3 currently handles TXLF perfectly.

Option 2: Try changing the file TXLF file extension to "XLF" or "XLIFF" -- does Verifika have a generic XLF filter?

[quote]I don't own version 3, so that's not an option. [/quote]

If you have a valid license for WFP5, then you have one included for WFP3. Just download and install it (the licensing system is different but if you have a WFP license on your account, then you should be able to activate WFP3).

[quote]Jorge Payan wrote:
Have you tried to open the .txlf files as xml in WF Pro 3 and then renaming their extension to .txml? [/quote]

I don't quite understand this suggestion. If you open any file in WFP3, the resulting bilingual file is already TXML, so there's no need to "rename" it to TXML.

[Edited at 2019-07-14 08:42 GMT]

Forcing exported or saved files to be txml | XLF works

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Forcing exported or saved files to be txml
Poster: Reed James
Post title: XLF works

Samuel,

I just changed the extension to xlf, and it works. thanks.

Confirming all

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Confirming all
Poster: James Muir

Hi everyone,

(Windows 10 64 bit)

I am just beginning to use WFP5 with a licence now after using in demo and using WFA for a few years.

I have been using Trados a while, so migration is a little painful; but I cannot work out why I do not have a "confirm all" option in translation editor. (Mark all as translated in studio.)

Essentially if I am leveraging from a TM - so I have opened the file, then I hit "translate all" to get as many 100% matches propagated as possible, leaving me with just the new stuff to translate, next up would be to fill in the untranslated and go about confirming it all so that the progress bar at the base of the screen reads 100%.

I do not have a confirm all/unconfirm all option at the top of the screen (just single confirms) & the ctrl, shift enter shortcut does not work for me. Alt down sometimes seems okay; next segment makes it turn purple; but the issue is not so much the verification and confirming, it's that I want to be able to do 150 or so at once, rather than doing each one singularly!

As an aside, and if I have to for example do each one individually with a click on the check to the right of the screen, how do I get rid of the black box that floats there stopping me from doing anything?

Sort of seems ridiculously slow at the moment, please help!

Confirming all | Use the "Commit All" button

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Confirming all
Poster: Stefan Stefanov
Post title: Use the "Commit All" button

You can use the "Commit All" button – that's what it does, it confirms all segments at once and writes their translation to the TM.

Although I don't quite understand why you're not confirming each segment (Alt + Down) as you work your way through the file. I only use "Commit All" after I've run spell check or Transcheck (during which the amended segment is not automatically confirmed).

Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5 | Redo a couple of projects you've done in WFP3 in WFP5?

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5
Poster: Stefan Stefanov
Post title: Redo a couple of projects you've done in WFP3 in WFP5?

I guess that's an easy enough option – take a small project (or file) you've completed in WFP3 and load it in WFP5. Use the translated file to copy-paste your existing translation from there.

I had used WFP3 for about 12 or 13 years before I migrated to WFP5 (this year finally). And I must say I like it better now, save for the lack of an Excel import wizard.

Don't worry, it's not that scary :) Importing your TMs and glossaries takes only minutes once you are ready to proceed.

Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5 | Thanks

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5
Poster: Hedwig Spitzer Cáceres
Post title: Thanks

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for your comments, I am somewhat reassured it will not be that traumatic. Good idea, I will try that!

Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5 | @Hedwig

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5
Poster: Samuel Murray
Post title: @Hedwig

[quote]Hedwig Spitzer Cáceres wrote:
I have been using my reliable, friendly, preferred and only WFP3 CAT tool for more than 15 years now (yes!!).
...
WFP5 scares me because of all the reported annoying bugs many people complain about in different forums. [/quote]

Yes, when WFP3 came out and the bugs that got reported went unfixed, we eventually got used to it. It's not as reliable or friendly as you believe -- you just got used it. The same will apply to WFP5. In the end, you'll love big brother. You'll get used to the bugs, you'll forget that you used to be more efficient in other ways and figure out how to be efficient in new ways. WFP5 is a terrible, terrible program, and I don't look forward to the day when I am finally forced to upgrade. But the trick in upgrading to newer versions programmed by new generations of programmers who discovered new generations of drugs to be on while programming, is to stop using the old version altogether. Otherwise you're constantly reminded of how bad the new version is. This is what worked for me when I was forced to move from Windows XP to Windows 7, and I suppose the same thing will happen when I'm forced to finally delete Word 2003 (oh, and Windows 7, too). A new keyboard or a new mouse is sooo annoying to use, until you get used to it.

I had to use WFP5 for a few hours yesterday (you can tell). The fact that I can move from the Find to the Replace field in the replacement dialog using Tab, but I can't move in the opposite direction using Shift+Tab, I find incredibly annoying. I am 100% convinced the programmer responsible for programming the replacement dialog had it scheduled on a Friday afternoon and his team leader was already at home getting stoned. Look, I'm sure that after a day or two of using the mouse to move the cursor upwards, I'll be so used to it that I wouldn't even find it odd, but while it is still new and strange to me, I hate it.

Wordfast Pro 5 - cannot load TM "collection exception" | Cannot load collection exception keeps happening

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Wordfast Pro 5 - cannot load TM "collection exception"
Poster: Barbara Pani
Post title: Cannot load collection exception keeps happening

Thank you David, it was indeed both of your suggestions: OneDrive and TM renamed and/or in different path (all subsequent to the cloud interferring).
I have now uninstalled OneDrive from my laptop.


Wordfast Pro 5.8 cursor does not automatically appear in Next Segment

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Wordfast Pro 5.8 cursor does not automatically appear in Next Segment
Poster: Barbara Pani

I have finally uploaded the 5.8 version and I am having issues almost every time I go to Next Segment, either via shortcut or clicking on the Next Segment button.

Any idea how I can fix this?
I am working with an Excel file.

Thank you guys!

Wordfast Pro 5.8 cursor does not automatically appear in Next Segment | Use the Feedback button

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Wordfast Pro 5.8 cursor does not automatically appear in Next Segment
Poster: Jean Lachaud
Post title: Use the Feedback button

I've found the support to be responsive when using the Feedback button.

Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5 | Thanks Samuel

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Migrating from WFP3 to WFP5
Poster: Hedwig Spitzer Cáceres
Post title: Thanks Samuel

I am just getting older :D . I guess we all get used to new versions of everyday use software, professional or not. I hate it too.

Cheers!

Administration Perspective WFP 3

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: Administration Perspective WFP 3
Poster: kneyens

Hi there,

I am in charge of cleaning up my team's TM (removing duplicates, removing tags etc.). I would like to do this in WFP 3 itself, but the program only lets me retrieve 100 segments at a time. However, our TM is rather big (+600 000). I have tried to change the maximum number, but it just doesn't work.

Right now, I am cleaning up the TM in Excel, but this is rather timeconsuming (and prone to mistakes if you ar not careful).

Does anyone have any ideas how I can more easily clean our big TM? Or how I can make the administration perspective work in WFP 3 properly?

Thank you very much for your help!
Katleen

WordFast Pro 5.8.0 - Trouble previewing .pptx files and saving "as translated"

$
0
0
Forum: Wordfast support
Topic: WordFast Pro 5.8.0 - Trouble previewing .pptx files and saving "as translated"
Poster: annapals

I'm translating from US English into Icelandic and have many years of experience working with WordFast. Lately, a problem has come up in my WordFast Pro 5.8.0 version. When I'm translating a .pptx file, it doesn't show up in the live preview. That would be okay, but the problem is also that when I save the file as translated, and then open it in Power Point, there is just one blank slide, nothing more, even if I've translated the whole 18 slides.

I tried saving the file in the old format (.ppt) and then, this problem disappears. However, there are features in .pptx that are lost when saving to the old version. Does anyone have a solution for this?

Best regards,
Anna
Viewing all 6221 articles
Browse latest View live